Answering Objections to Abolition Part 2

We're back again with Joshua Jenkins and Kevan Myers finishing out our two-part series on objections to an abolitionist approach to ending abortion.
We're back again with Joshua Jenkins and Kevan Myers finishing out our two-part series on objections to an abolitionist approach to ending abortion.

Episode Guide:

5:01 - Why do we believe women (and all those involved in abortion) should be prosecuted? Aren't women victims?

8:32 - Abolition is loving to all people

16:00 - Would an abolition bill punish people who'd be involved in abortion prior to the law's implementation? Also - how would prosecuting these crimes work?

24:35 - If we passed an abolition law, it'd just get held up in court, so why should we still work to pass a law like that?

29:35 - What should a state do if that happens? What is the doctrine of lesser magistrates and interposition?

37:19 - Why are incremental laws wrong, and also, why don't they work?

45:30 - Note about the New York Times interviewing someone who performed a home abortion.

46:25 - What would a successful abolition law's implementation look like?

Links:

Our Website, where you can sign up for our newsletter - https://abolishabortionmo.org/

Video of the New York Time's expose` of a woman who performed a home abortion on herself - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjIgYs81mB8

Free the States - https://freethestates.org/

Rescue Those - https://www.rescuethose.com/
Answering Objections to Abolition Part 2
Broadcast by